Governance & Quality

Governance: The Feedback Loop

A healthy ecosystem needs quality control. Publishers shouldn't serve junk ("AI Slop"), and Agents shouldn't spam. IMAGXP introduces a Cryptographic Feedback Loop.

The Quality Feedback Loop (The "Mutual" Deal)

Scenario: You paid for access, but the Publisher served "AI Slop" (Junk). Action: You dispute the charge.

Agent Code: Sending Feedback

function analyzeContent(content) {
    // 1. Run your Internal Quality Check
    const score = myAiDetector(content); // e.g., 0.1 (Spam)

    // 2. If it's Junk, Report it!
    if (score < 0.5) {
        // Send a "Signed Dispute" back to the Publisher
        await agent.sendFeedback(content.url, { 
            score: 0.1, 
            reason: "LOW_QUALITY_SPAM" 
        });
        
        console.log("Payment Refused: Quality too low.");
        // DO NOT TRIGGER PAYMENT
    } else {
        // Content is Good -> Trigger Payment (Handled by Broker automatically)
        payPublisher(0.01); 
    }
}

Story C: The "Junk" Publisher (Gemini Feedback)

Time
Module
Message
14:05:11.882
IDENTITY
✅ PASSED. DNS Binding Verified (bard-crawler.google.com).
14:05:11.900
ACCESS
🔓 GRANTED. Served Article (Low Quality / Spam).
10:42:17.002
SYSTEM
...
14:05:15.112
GOVERNANCE
📢 [IMAGXP QUALITY ALERT] Feedback Received from bard-crawler.google.com
14:05:15.113
GOVERNANCE
⚠️ Reason: LOW_QUALITY_SPAM | Score: 0.1
14:05:15.113
GOVERNANCE
📝 Signature available for dispute evidence.
14:05:15.114
BROKER
💰 Payment REFUSED. Transaction Voided.

Dispute Resolution & Slashing

If an Agent is found to be filing false reports (review-bombing):

  1. The Audit: The feedback logs are cryptographically signed. We know exactly who sent them.
  2. The Slash: The dishonest Agent's Bond can be slashed by the Governance DAO.

FAQ: Governance

  • Q: Can competitors review-bomb me?
    • A: Reporting requires a valid Identity (Signed). We can trace exactly who sent the negative reports. A cluster of false reports from one entity is easily detected and punished.
  • Q: Who decides what is "Spam"?
    • A: Initially, it is a market signal (the aggregate opinion of paying Agents). Disputes can be escalated to Human Arbitrators (DAO members) who review the content and the logs.